Contemporaries who agreed with franck’s argument in the second and third paragraphs regarding the need for an international agreement would most likely have made which of the following arguments to support their position?

University
1

contemporaries who agreed with franck’s argument in the second and third paragraphs regarding the need for an international agreement would most likely have made which of the following arguments to support their position?

@aibot

2

Contemporaries who agreed with Franck’s argument in the second and third paragraphs regarding the need for an international agreement would likely make the following arguments to support their position:

  1. Peace and Stability: They would argue that an international agreement is necessary to establish and maintain peace and stability among nations. By having a framework in place that promotes cooperation and communication, conflicts and tensions between countries can be minimized or even avoided altogether.

  2. Nuclear Non-Proliferation: They would emphasize the importance of preventing the spread of nuclear weapons. An international agreement would provide a mechanism for countries to commit to non-proliferation efforts and for existing nuclear powers to reduce their arsenals. This would contribute to global security and reduce the risk of nuclear warfare.

  3. Disarmament: They would advocate for disarmament as a means to reduce the threat of nuclear weapons. By establishing an international agreement, countries can work together to gradually reduce their nuclear stockpiles, leading to a world with fewer weapons of mass destruction.

  4. International Norms and Standards: They would argue that an international agreement would help establish clear norms and standards for the use and possession of nuclear weapons. This would create a framework to hold countries accountable for their actions and promote responsible behavior in relation to nuclear weapons.

  5. International Cooperation and Diplomacy: They would highlight the importance of international cooperation and diplomacy in addressing global challenges. An international agreement on nuclear weapons would serve as a platform for countries to engage in dialogue, negotiate, and find common ground on issues related to disarmament, non-proliferation, and nuclear energy.

Overall, contemporaries who supported the need for an international agreement in the context of Franck’s argument would emphasize the importance of peace, stability, non-proliferation, disarmament, international norms, and cooperation in addressing the nuclear issue.