in mcculloch v. maryland, what did the state of maryland argue? banks cannot be created by congress. states can determine which institutions within its borders must pay taxes. a federal bank must pay taxes to the state in which it is located. banks may only be created by congress, not by individuals.
In McCulloch v. Maryland, what did the state of Maryland argue?
Answer: The state of Maryland argued that banks cannot be created by Congress and that states have the authority to determine which institutions within their borders must pay taxes. They contended that a federal bank must pay taxes to the state in which it is located, and that banks may only be created by Congress, not by individuals.