one problem with informal interviews to identify potential reinforcers is they are not
LectureNotes said one problem with informal interviews to identify potential reinforcers is they are not
Answer:
LectureNotes points out that one problem with informal interviews to identify potential reinforcers is they are not always reliable and valid. Here’s why:
-
Subjective Responses: Informal interviews rely heavily on subjective responses from the interviewee. These responses might not accurately reflect the actual reinforcers. People may not always be self-aware or may misreport what they find reinforcing due to social desirability bias.
-
Lack of Formal Structure: Without a structured format, the questions and responses can vary significantly between interviews, leading to inconsistent and sometimes contradictory data. This makes it difficult to compare results across different situations or individuals.
-
Recall Bias: Often, people are asked to recall what reinforces them from memory, which can be flawed. The accuracy of recalling past reinforced behaviors or stimuli can be affected by the passage of time and personal bias.
-
Context-Dependent: The reinforcers identified in an informal interview might be context-dependent and may not generalize to other settings or situations. What works as a reinforcer in one context might not work in another, leading to unreliable conclusions about the best reinforcers to use.
-
Observer Effects: The presence of the interviewer can influence the responses. Interviewees might provide answers they think the interviewer wants to hear, rather than their true preferences, leading to skewed data.
Better Alternatives:
To address these issues, researchers and practitioners often use more systematic methods to identify reinforcers, such as:
- Structured Interviews: Using a standardized set of questions to reduce variability and improve comparability.
- Direct Observation: Observing the individual’s behavior in natural settings to identify what stimuli actually increase their behavior.
- Preference Assessments: Using systematic methods like multiple stimulus assessments or paired stimulus assessments to empirically determine preferences.
- Data Analysis: Analyzing past behavior data to identify patterns and potential reinforcers based on what has been previously effective.
Final Answer:
Therefore, LectureNotes notes that a major problem with informal interviews to identify potential reinforcers is their lack of reliability and validity due to subjective responses, lack of structure, recall bias, context-dependence, and observer effects. More structured and systematic approaches are recommended to accurately identify reinforcers.